All Post-Science Medicine advices are based on the extensive experience of post-science members and extensive surveys of others. Post-Science Medicine advises that one should not make suggestions unless one has tested out the suggestion personally or have read the survey.
Many other natural cures in Post-Science Medicine will be added as they are verified.
Because they are medicines, medicines which are recommended by Post-Science Medicine, should be taken in appropriate limited amount.
Post-Science Medicine relates to some very fundamental questions in medicine. Post-science does not believe that drug test can be empirically verified because DNA is designed to propagate to infinity in time. Also, Post-science believes in self-creation based on the post-science discovery of completely automated software, of which DNA is a prime example. If our foods are created, our medicines must also be created with our foods; Post-Science Medicine believes that medicines are an extension of foods. For example, elderberry juice is the cure for common cold. Is there a cure for common cold in Western Medicine? The foundation of Post-Science Medicine is post-science or self-creation. Science is based on empirical verification and is insufficient in dealing with life. A more detailed discussion of Post-Science Medicine is given in the book Knowledge by Hugh Ching, C. V Ramamoorthy, T. L Kunii, and Ta-You Wu. The Chapter on Health is give Here.
DNA is by far the most valuable product in the universe. Thus, death is the biggest loss and the greatest insult in life. The knowledge in the mind can be preserved in books and other type of publications, and DNA should be preserved by cloning, after a DNA has demonstrated through a life-time of expression that it has positive value. Universal Permanent Software (UPS), which is completely automated software, can be used to simulate the DNA system, where DNA has been assigned the Universal Permanent Numbers 0, 1, 2, 3.
"As human beings representing the intelligence of the DNA Software System, we should strive to write software based on the software foundation connected to the DNA System." Hugh Ching, Founder of Post-Science
The design of software, which including DNA, the code of life, is not free because it must satisfy the requirement of permanence or the value of software will be zero or negative. Ignorant of the requirement of permanence causes the bulk of software budget to be used for software update and maintenance.
We Are Free Only Within The Limit Of Freedom. But, The Limit Of Freedom Is Outside Of The Present Human Intelligence
Today, mankind can only handle 5-variable problems in science. We need intelligence to handle problems in social science with 50 variables and problems in life or computer science with 500 variables.
The best minds today are switching from physics and mathematics to computer or life science, but problems in computer or life science contain around 500 variables, while the Nobel Prize winners can barely handle 10 variables. Only four people, Ta-You Wu, Hugh Ching, T. L. Kunii, and Rustin Roy can think and understand the significance of the physics solution of touch, which contains 25 variables.
It is really that the human brain power needs to be enhance by 50 to 100% or more in order to move society beyond the current Age of Science. We needs to look into subjects related to trophic factors, which enhances brain power in preemies at UC San Diego and Stanford University.
Living organisms are created with a great deal of tolerance. Thus, fuzziness is not only a characteristic of reality involving living organisms, particularly humans, but also a factor in the design of socioeconomic and living systems, such as in the solution of value and the solution of software. For example, the Infinite Spreadsheet requires fuzziness to justify its approximate time-invariant inputs, and although Computing with Integers is rigorous, Computing with Words must be based on Human Associative Memory, which is fuzzy. We need to Debate Which Is Correct: English-like or Integer-Like Source Code? and to Make the Word “Fuzzy” Respectable in the Intellectual Community and Society.